Does Michigan’s “Right to Farm Act” protect bee keepers in City Limits from nuisance lawsuits, or not?
The Right to Farm act was enacted in 1981 to protect farmers from nuisance lawsuits as the city folks expanded into farming areas. If a city slicker moved next to a farm and sued them for animal smells, the suit could be thrown out if the farmer was following the rules in the right to farm act (GAAMP).
Last year our new State Government decided to remove the right to farm protections for what they now call “residential” areas; ie. a non farm home within 250 feet. That pretty much removed State protections for anybody living close to a city or on a small lot. The reasoning given was too many hobbyists were trying to raise livestock (chickens, goats, a cow, etc) in residential and city limits and using the state law to defeat city ordinances.
However bees evidently were never considered “livestock” in the state laws and hence this 2014 change to the right to farm act didn’t really affect bee keeping; I believe. Anybody have another opinion on this?So along comes 2015 and the state government is back at it again. This time they’ve defined new rules for locating hives on your property and fences that, when followed, evidently give us bee keepers protection from nuisance lawsuits if we follow their rules.
http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2015/01/small_farmers_relieved_that_mi.html#incart_related_storiesThe state rules sound reasonable to me, but I’m wondering if they can be used to trump any city ordinances about keeping bees in City limits? Thoughts? I keep most of my bees on a farm that falls under the state protections, but I do own some city property and have kept bees in residential areas before (without the fences). In general the City governments around here are very anti people and I suspect they would/will ban bee keeping any time they get the chance.